http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19974672/
This here... is an exact quote from this article. The article was written, about the different styles of Hillary Clinton and Fred Thompson.
...will credit Clinton — widely criticized at the race’s onset as a wooden, impersonal speaker — with a surprisingly savvy series of early debate performances that won over some of her most ardent skeptics.I... have no idea what to say to that. Other then... did I miss something? Now granted... if I was playing the "Pick a Democratic Presidential Candidate" game... I'd aim for her. But seriously. Savvy? Savvy? SAVVY?!
And may I point out that ardent is a great Scrabble word, but a horrible when placed in front of a noun.
“As it turned out, like every previous Democratic debate, we were left watching Hillary and the Seven Dwarfs,”OK. That would be the worst movie ever! EVER! And I know, I'm using the bold thing a lot here.
The article was written with a strong Hillary-bias. It compared the strategies of Fred Thompson and Hillary Clinton. When you read it, you get the vibe from it that the writer is trying to say..."While Hillary's strategy is well thought out and genius, Fred Thompson's strategy is pointless and stupid."
I have decided that it will probably be these two that represent their political parties in the general election.




